Most data platforms bolt on a sharing function as an afterthought. Users get a URL and maybe some comments, but that is file hosting with extra steps.

Real collaboration looks like two people editing the same notebook simultaneously without overwriting each other. It looks like version history that shows exactly who changed what line and when, so nobody is guessing who broke the query. And it means review workflows where teammates can leave comments on specific cells instead of pasting code into Slack and waiting for someone to reply "lgtm."

Here is a quick comparison of what "collaboration" actually means:

Where It Breaks Down

We heard this story over and over in the hundreds of interviews we did before building Zerve. One person finishes their piece of an analysis and exports the notebook. Someone else downloads it and tries to merge their own work in. A package version doesn't match, so the numbers come out different. Nobody knows whose results to trust. The process was never designed for teams, and teams have been paying for it with their time ever since.

What Collaboration Looks Like in Zerve

We built Zerve so that "working together" means something more than passing files back and forth. When a team opens a project in Zerve, everyone is in it at the same time. Edits land live. If Figma or Google Docs set the standard for working alongside someone without stepping on their toes, that is the experience we were after, except applied to a data science workflow with actual compute behind it.

Real-Time Co-Editing

Picture a data scientist writing a SQL query to pull customer data while a colleague builds a visualization a few blocks downstream. Both are in the same project, working at the same time. No file locks, no "let me know when you're done," no merge conflicts at the end of the day.

The reason this works without everything falling apart is architectural. Zerve isolates each code block with its own compute. In a traditional notebook, everything shares one kernel and one memory state. One person kicks off a heavy model training run, and suddenly the other's session is choking. Or worse, a variable gets overwritten three cells up. Most notebook "collaboration" boils down to polite turn-taking because of that shared state problem. Zerve was built from the ground up so it doesn't exist.

Read: Jupyter vs Zerve for an in-depth comparison of Real-Time Co-Editing Functions: https://www.zerve.ai/compare/zerve-vs-jupyter 

Version Control That Actually Helps

Everybody agrees version control matters in data science, and almost nobody does it consistently. The tooling is just annoying enough that people skip it when moving fast, which is always.

Zerve flips this around. Every time a block runs, the platform logs it automatically. Who ran it, when, what went in, what came out. All captured in the background whether or not anyone remembers to commit.

Teams can still use GitHub the way they normally would. Branching, pull requests, all of that works. But the version history in Zerve stays connected to the compute environment and the data, which is the part Git alone can't capture. A diff shows what changed in the code. Block run history shows what actually happened when the code ran.

Read: Block Run History for Transparent Collaboration in Zerve: https://www.zerve.ai/blog/new-block-run-history-for-more-transparent-collaboration 

Review Workflows Inside the Platform

Code review on most data teams still happens in Slack. Someone pastes a block, someone else glances at it between meetings, and the whole thing gets a thumbs-up emoji as sign-off.

In Zerve, review happens inside the project itself. Comments go on specific blocks rather than in a separate chat thread. Stakeholders pull up live results without installing anything or setting up their own environment. The feedback is better because the person giving it can see the code, the output, and the data all at once instead of squinting at a cropped screenshot.

Read: AI Agents Built for Data Workflows: https://docs.zerve.ai/guide/canvas-view/ai-agent 

Onboarding Without the Setup Tax

Onboarding onto a new data platform rarely comes up during platform evaluation, and it should. When a new person joins a project, the first task is almost never the actual work. It is getting Python configured, hunting down the right package versions, and tracking down database credentials that cooperate with their machine. That setup process eats half a day on a good week. Sometimes two.

Zerve stops that cycle. A new person joins and lands in the exact same environment everyone else is already using. Dependencies, connections, compute setup, all inherited. Contributing starts immediately, which is how onboarding should have worked all along.

The Agent as a Collaborator

Collaboration usually means human-to-human. Zerve's AI agent adds a different dimension. It has context on the project's data and the code that has already been written, so it can do real work without a long briefing. A senior data scientist might scaffold the project, then point the agent at the data cleaning instead of doing it manually. A junior team member might ask it to walk through a confusing block of code or draft a first-pass analysis. The agent handles the kind of tasks that would otherwise require interrupting a colleague, and it can run in parallel with other agents on the same project.

Try It

Zerve is free. Sign up here to get started.